• Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
  • News
  • Contact

Blog

  • You are here:
  • Home
  • Ontario Court of Appeal Affirms Cost-Sharing Mechanism Developed by the Ontario Energy Board

Ontario Court of Appeal Affirms Cost-Sharing Mechanism Developed by the Ontario Energy Board

  • Posted by Jennifer Saville
  • On August 8, 2018
  • In Court Appearances and Decisions
  • 0

The decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Union Gas Limited v. Township of Norwich, in which Phil Tunley acted on behalf of the Ontario Energy Board as an intervenor, gives effect to a cost-sharing mechanism developed by the Board in its 1986 Report and Model Franchise Agreement, to allocate costs of gas pipeline relocations that result from municipal drainages and other works. Tunley, on behalf of the Board, provided submissions on the policy behind the cost-sharing provisions of the Model Franchise Agreement and how certain provisions of statutory language should be interpreted.

The decision is featured in this week’s edition of the Ontario Reports.

TAGS: appeal Court of Appeal Energy law Model Franchise Agreement Ontario Energy Board Phil Tunley St. Lawrence Barristers Toronto
Share:

Previous Post

Phil Tunley Recognized for 20 Years of Service at the Intensive Trial Advocacy Workshop

Next Post

Alexi Wood Asked to Sit on the International Advisory Council for the University of Cincinnati College of Law
Scroll
  • Home
  • About us
  • News
  • Contact

44 King Street East, Toronto, ON M5C 1G8

Tel: +1 647-245-2121 | Fax: +1 647-245-8285 | Email: info@stlbarristers.ca

Copyright © 2017 St. Lawrence Barristers LLP. All rights reserved.